Tyler Kushnir, Author at Anchored Outdoors https://anchoredoutdoors.com/author/tyler-kushnir/ Anchored Outdoors - Fish, Hunt, Forage, Homestead Sun, 09 Feb 2025 22:17:11 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0 https://anchoredoutdoors.com/wp-content/uploads/cropped-AnchoredLogo-favicon-1-1-32x32.png Tyler Kushnir, Author at Anchored Outdoors https://anchoredoutdoors.com/author/tyler-kushnir/ 32 32 The Intruder: Ed and I — Tyler Kushnir https://anchoredoutdoors.com/the-intruder-ed-and-i-tyler-kushnir/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=the-intruder-ed-and-i-tyler-kushnir Mon, 09 Mar 2020 01:48:00 +0000 https://anchoredoutdoors.com/?p=3787 Often imitated never duplicated — Tyler Kushnir explains the original intruder pattern.

The post The Intruder: Ed and I — Tyler Kushnir appeared first on Anchored Outdoors.

]]>

By Tyler Kushnir:


It is interesting to see how a fly pattern morphs into a fly style. The first fly that comes to mind is Ed Ward and Jerry French‘s Intruder. I am certain that these innovators would not recognize many of today’s patterns as the ones they developed (and I am pretty sure Ed would have something to say about it). 

I have thought a great deal about how this comes about. As a friend of Ed, for many years I struggled when people showed off their “Intruders.” I finally just kept my mouth shut and stopped pointing out the inaccuracies, as I remembered my own journey with trying to tie the almost mythical Intruder. Like Ed himself, the fly was more a rumor, something whispered about by a close-knit group. The first time I met Ed on the banks of the Sauk I said, “Wow, you really do exist.” 

Variations.

Until Ed finally gave me a close up look at an actual Intruder, I made a lot of guesses based off a vague photo in one of Trey Combs’ books. My flies looked like a lot of the “Intruders” one sees on social media these days. Reminiscent of, but not the Real Deal. Those who know Ed and Jerry will be familiar with their scientific approach. The evolution of their Intruder was a well thought out process, from the materials to the techniques needed to achieve their desired effect.

The first and maybe most important thing was to create a fly that would entice the most aggressive fish. Not something to eat—rather something to crush, to annihilate and get the hell out of my space—hence the moniker Intruder. To do this would necessitate a large presence. They went with the basic idea of a squid—a favorite ocean food of steelhead. A significant problem with large profile flies is the bulk and water resistance that the bulk presents. Getting dense bulky flies to swim down where winter fish live is difficult—and casting them can be an adventure too. Ed, Jerry and the other Skagit masters such as Kinney, O’Donnel, McCune, Hogan et al., solved a lot of the casting issues with their versions of the Skagit line and casts. Yet the issue of getting big bulky flies to swim where Ed and Jerry wanted them remained.

Here is where the true genius of their fly comes in. The Intruder is a big profile fly that does it without bulk! This is accomplished by the key ingredient—and the one most overlooked by those tying today’s Intruders—ring-necked pheasant tail feathers as the hackles. I have watched Ed soak and then painstakingly split with a razor the central tails of pheasants. Then while still wet, carefully wrap two or three turns as hackle. The result is a relatively stiff hackle that resists folding back too much and thus retains the appearance of bulk with very little material. The pheasant tail is further supported by a shoulder hackle and a small ball of spun deer hair. The pair of stiff hackles provide the appearance of bulk and as Ed would tell you, a vortex to wiggle the swim a bit. The rest of the fly was also subject to their close scrutiny. However, I believe the use of ring-necked pheasant tail feather as hackles is the key.

Starting from the rear was a shoulder hackle, then two bunches of ostrich herl tied to flare out like the legs/claws of a prawn. Ed was adamant that each clump had precisely nine herls. Then came the aforementioned pheasant hackle, followed by a thin body of dubbing with a hen hackle palmered forward. This is followed by the front hackle with its spun deer hair and shoulder hackle (sometimes I also add a facing hackle for a bit of color). Next came the wings of two to four grizzly hackles, usually natural. Then a small set of lead eyes. These were not to sink the fly, rather to provide balance and a jig-action when the fly finds a bit of slack on the swing. Small lead eyes work best.

Color is open to the tier’s choice. I have found that it is a little limited by the difficulty of dying the pheasant tail, but that is where I will use a turn of a long saddle or spey hackle for the splash of color I want. I have caught lots of fish on black as well as more natural tans and browns. 

In all the years I fished with Ed before he went back to Michigan I never saw him fish an Intruder. It was almost always a string leach. When I commented he said, “I don’t want to lose an Intruder—they take me an hour to tie!” When I laughed he said, “Besides, you are using one.”

As I saw it there were two reasons—maybe three for the tying time. Certainly, Ed’s meticulous approach was one, but the others are in my opinion technical.

The first issue was the splitting and tying of the ring-necked tail. You had to soak it in warm water, carefully split it with a razor, and then wrap it on before it dried so it didn’t crack. It was still a nightmare to wrap.

Then there was his intricate set up for his hook. First he cut the bend off a particular hook (I never bothered to find out which). He filed and smoothed it down to a taper, then a small bit of plastic was carefully stripped off some copper wire, the tippet was passed through the eye of the hook, threaded through the little length of plastic, and finally a hook that Ed custom bent to the shape he wanted was tied on and the plastic was threaded onto the tapered end of the shank. The line was adjusted so that the hook dangled free and faced up—both of which Ed felt improved hooking ratios—and I think made it less likely to snag on something and the masterpiece be lost.

This is my story of Ed and the Intruder, which was both fun and educational. My solutions, while maintaining the integrity of the brilliant concept were three-fold—none of which readily passed Ed’s rigid standards. Grudgingly, he eventually gave me his blessing and it cut tying time in half. 

First was the ring-necked pheasant tail. Rather than try to split it I soaked it overnight in water with hair conditioner in it. Then while it was still wet, stripped it from the top of the stem with the strong membrane still attached. Not only was it easy, but there was little or no waste. And when it dried it remained supple enough to easily wrap, but it was tough and still stiff enough to keep the hackles doing their job. I would strip a bunch at a time and store them for easy future use. I saved lots of time! Ed harrumphed, but said okay (but l know he still split his anyway).

The issue of hook preparation was solved by tying on a tube. Again, Ed didn’t like it—but agreed it looked right. His final line of defense was the free swinging hook. I had simply inserted the hook into a piece of junction tubing facing up. Of course Ed did not like it—he was indeed consistent. After some thought I solved the dangle issue to Ed’s satisfaction. I used a thin tube to tie the fly, then a short piece of junction tube. Next I attached the hook (a Partridge Salar that was virtually same shape Ed created by bending) with a short non-slip loop knot. Then making certain the hook was facing up, I pulled the knot into the junction tubing until it butted up against the thin tube of the fly. The hook dangled perfectly.

Indeed I had changed things, but in the end Ed grudgingly admitted that, “it was a real Intruder,” as I maintained the keys that make the fly. 

Like all of us, Ed and Jerry continue to tweak and think and tune things, and their flies indeed evolve as well. However, looking at some of Jerry’s recent ties the essential tenets of the Intruder concept remain. A big profile to illicit aggressive grabs and the appearance of bulk without a great wad of material that would inhibit sinking readily. New materials can work really well, so long as this appearance of bulk is maintained.

The “Intruder Style” of fly is now truly wide-spread and tiers will add their take on what that means. I do believe that if they have a grasp of the essential design concepts that Ed and Jerry came up with, these newer patterns will have great success. 

The post The Intruder: Ed and I — Tyler Kushnir appeared first on Anchored Outdoors.

]]>
In Search of the Magic Bullet – Tyler Kushnir https://anchoredoutdoors.com/in-search-of-the-magic-bullet/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=in-search-of-the-magic-bullet Sun, 23 Feb 2020 10:22:00 +0000 https://anchoredoutdoors.com/?p=1222 Tyler Kushnir explains why it pays off to put in the work to become a better fly caster.

The post In Search of the Magic Bullet – Tyler Kushnir appeared first on Anchored Outdoors.

]]>

By Tyler Kushnir:


In the world of fishing with two-handed rods, the topic of casting is never far from the surface. The Spey rod itself is a fabulous tool for fishing, but without the cast, it doesn’t fish well. It follows that the better you cast and cover water, the more fish you will find. So for all of us there should be an ongoing interest in becoming a better Spey caster. 

Unfortunately, there is a stance out there I hear all too often… it’s one I call, “I can get it out there so why worry.” This is fair enough, unless of course you want to find a few more fish. Now, there are some line systems that enable this school of thought. There is a reason guides love Skagit lines—not that being a really good Skagit caster doesn’t require skill—it does indeed—but in a half hour a guide can have their guest flopping the fly out far enough (hopefully) to catch a fish.

There is a second school of thought: I call this one, “The Search for the Magic Bullet.” This is where the angler tells themselves, “I am an okay caster, and if I just had a better rod or a better line, then I could be a really good caster.” 

Without a doubt there have been a lot of fantastic developments in both Spey rods and lines. They all really do cast much better than they did 15 years ago. The weakness in the Magic Bullet train of thought is that these improved tools only work if you know how to use them. I remember back in the day, when Way Yin’s XLT line came out. The Magic Bullet crowd went wild after Steve Choate won the prestigious Musto Championship in Britain—the Magic Bullet folks just knew that if they got an XLT they would be great casters. 

The problem, of course, was that the XLT was an expert’s long belly line and without expert skills the line was very difficult to cast. Then, thanks to the Skagit Jedis and in no small part to Ed Ward, along came the introduction of the Skagit line. The revolution that followed has been amazing: all of a sudden here was a line that most everyone could cast well enough to fish. However, there is a dark side to this Skagit revolution—and that is a result of its very strength—it is so easy to use that most anglers don’t advance their casting skills much past the flop-it-out-there stage. Again, not the worst thing, but there is so much more. 

I have fished many days with Ed and he is a brilliant caster with his system. Simply brilliant. However, his skill is not due to his line… rather it is dedication to becoming a great caster that made him a great caster. 

Here lies the issue, the crux of the Magic Bullet failure… there simply isn’t one. There is no short cut, no quick fix, no magic rod or line. The path to casting proficiency lies with one thing and one thing only—the only Magic Bullet is practice. 

Rare indeed is the angler who actually practices! Yes, most people have limited time to fish so they don’t want to “waste” it on practice. Or they say they practice while they are fishing. The great Scottish caster Derek Brown once told me that I must practice with yarn only. He said the instant you tie on a fly you are only thinking about finding a fish—practice is not part of that program. 

Derek was completely correct. The only way to become a better caster is to practice, practice some more… and then practice some more. I also suggest investing in a lesson or two from a qualified instructor (not your buddy), and then practice what you learn. 

The time invested in practice will pay huge dividends. You will cover more water presenting your fly to more fish. The skills developed by real practice will enable you to ad lib when you find yourself in a weird wind, an awkward spot or near obstructions. It will also do nice things for your confidence—watching a sweet loop unroll over the water is a fine thing indeed. 

So no matter what rod and line system you prefer: Skagit casters, Scandi casters, long belly casters—even competitive casters—will all reap the benefits of practice. Search not for a Magic Bullet. Instead, practice.

Episode #: 138 (click to listen)
Duration: 53 min
Topics Discussed: The Thompson River, getting older and competitive casting
Bio: Tyler Kushnir has been fishing for trout and steelhead since the 1960s. A retired high school teacher and well-known fishing personality, he’s been at the heart of steelhead advocacy for as long as I’ve known him. Tyler put in 18 years of guiding on B.C.’s Haida Gwaii before hanging up his hat and becoming vice president of the Steelhead Society of B.C. Tyler is a skilled float fisherman, though it’s Spey casting that consumes his time these days. A Spey-O-Rama competitor, he won the inaugural Senior Championship in 2012 and continues to practice and compete with the belief that it makes him a better angler.

 

The post In Search of the Magic Bullet – Tyler Kushnir appeared first on Anchored Outdoors.

]]>